Posts Tagged “AR-15”

I never thougth to much of David Spade until now…. Kudos to you David for not being an anti-gun weenie.

From the The Arizona Republic

Actor’s $100K donation to benefit Phoenix officers

expected to buy 50 semi-automatic rifles for Phoenix officers

by Michael Ferraresi - Dec. 23, 2008 12:00 AM

An unexpected donation from actor David Spade is expected to provide Phoenix police with enough money to buy an additional 50 semi-automatic rifles for patrol officers in 2009.

The $100,000 announced Monday means as many as 300 officers could soon be armed with Bushmaster AR-15s, even in light of recent debates between police and union officials about the availability of the high-powered weapons during the city’s ongoing budget strife.

Advocates said the need to arm more patrol officers with rifles has only grown since union officials proposed in 2006 that officers should be allowed to buy their rifles if the city is unable to provide them. Police leaders met recently on the issue but have yet to expand the self-purchase policy beyond handguns and shotguns. Spade, a Scottsdale Saguaro High School graduate, provided the money to a non-profit police foundation after seeing a jarring television news report about gun violence. Police leaders said Spade told them he was inspired to help keep the community safe.
The comic-turned-movie star provided the check to Phoenix Police Chief Jack Harris early Monday but did not appear at the press conference. The Phoenix Police Foundation expects to use the $100,000 on rifles.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from Firearms & Freedom

Sounds like Remington gets it

David Codrea talked to Remington CEO Tommy Millner, who assured him that Remington takes the H-S Precision incident very seriously, and will put pressure on them, up to and including changing suppliers. Good to see.

I also agree with David that it is great to see Mr. Millner being as open and accessible as he has been, especially considering that the problem has very little to do with Remington. Contrast that to the deafening silence from H-S Precision.

In other news, one of Breda’s readers talked to H-S, and they say a statement will be coming soon. This better be good.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , ,

Comments No Comments »

The Firearm Blog had information about the AR57 earlier in the year, here is an update.  This AR57 is fully suppressed:

Sneak peek of intergrally suppressed AR57

The AR Five Seven is a one piece 5.7×28mm upper that attaches to a lower and uses the 50 round P90 magazines. 57 Center posted a few photos of their new integrally suppressed AR57 model:

 Images 573
How cool is that!

 Images 572

An integral encompasses the barrel which is ported at various strategic points to bleed off gas. The advantage is that the does not extend much further than the muzzle, if at all, and its weight is distributed along the barrel instead of in front of the muzzle.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

 

The NSSF has put together a great fact sheet on Assault Weapons.  The fact sheet debunks many of the liberal myths that have been floating around since the 1990s. 

Attention liberals…find a friend that can read this to you.  You may learn something.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON SO-CALLED ‘ASSAULT WEAPONS’

What has erroneously been termed an “assault weapon” is a semi-automatic firearm that fires just one bullet with each pull of the trigger (versus a fully automatic firearm — -

AR-15 (not an assult weapon)

AR-15 (not an assult weapon)

- which continues to shoot until the trigger is released). Specifically, has incorrectly defined an “assault weapon” as a semi-automatic firearm that can accept a detachable magazine and has two or more of the following cosmetic features (it is these cosmetic features that distinguish the firearm from other “non-assault weapons.”):

• A folding or telescoping stock
• A grip
• A mount
• A flash suppressor, or threads to attach one
• A grenade launcher

None of these features figure into the criminal misuse of , regardless of their appearance.

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

There is a tremendous amount of misinformation surrounding the issue of so-called “assault weapons.” Below are several of the more misleading allegations related to these followed by corresponding statements of fact:

Claim: A commercially-sold “assault weapon” is a and has no place in civilian hands.

Fact: A so-called “assault weapon” is NOT a or automatic firearm. Automatic were severely restricted from civilian ownership under the 1934 . A so-called “assault weapon” is functionally no different than any other “legal” firearm. These guns fire in the same manner as any other semi-automatic firearm (one shot per trigger pull – no spray firing), they shoot the same as other guns of the same caliber and are no more powerful. What differentiates a so-called “assault weapon” from other guns is cosmetic; for example, the type of stock on the gun, which makes the conventionally operating firearm look more like a firearm.

The gun-ban lobby understands that the confusion over what is and what is not an “assault weapon” only benefits them. Consider this statement from Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center:

“The public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a is presumed to be a — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

Claim: Semi-automatic “assault weapons” are high-powered guns that are meant for war.

Fact: So-called “Assault weapons” are more often than not less powerful than other hunting rifles. The term “assault weapon” was conjured up by anti-gun legislators to scare voters into thinking these are something out of a horror movie. These guns are used for many activities. In fact, the Colt AR-15 and Springfield M1A, both labeled “assault weapons,” are the rifles most often used for marksmanship competitions in the . And their cartridges are standard hunting calibers, useful for game up to and including deer.

Claim: The 1994 “” helped to reduce violent crime.

Fact: A recent comprehensive study by the Centers for Disease Control — hardly a pro-gun entity — looked at the full panoply of gun control measures — including the “” — and concluded that none could be proven to reduce crime. Homicide statistics demonstrate that the miniscule use of so-called “assault weapons” in crime (less than 1 percent) continued to decrease after the ten-year ban expired in 2004 and their manufacturing and sales resumed.

Another study, commissioned by , found “the banned weapons and were never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders.”

The report also noted that so-called “assault weapons” were “rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.”

Conclusion:

Crime control should be based upon solid facts, not emotions, cosmetics or appearance. Semi-automatic are now the most popular type of firearm in America and are used for a wide variety of legitimate sporting purposes, including hunting, small game control, target shooting and personal defense. They should not be banned.

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from The Firearm Blog

Colt’s new AR-15 firearms

Over the past few months Colt has been unveiling a variety of new AR-15 firearms. If a replacement for the M16 or M4 is chosen they want it to be a Colt. To ensure this designed a range of weapons that should cover all bases. David @ Defense Review has been relentlessly covering the new firearms.

Many of the improvements Colt have developed have been applied to all these guns, I won’t list them all, click the links to read the full details.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »