Posts Tagged “Caliber”

NRA-ILA Site Updates

Ammo Ban And Registration Proposal Getting Fresh Look

Friday, December 12, 2008

Happy Holidays: Now dispose of all of your ammunition! Every last round! From now on, you will be able to buy only overpriced ammunition that will be registered to you in a database.

Not yet–at least for now. A small company, Ammunition Accountability–which wants to help anti-gunners price and regulate the Second Amendment out of existence, profit at the expense of our rights, or both–has found radical anti-gun legislators in 18 states willing to introduce bills pushing such nonsense.

But few anti-gun proposals are so overtly aimed at destroying the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. As we began noting on http://www.nraila.org/in January, so-called “encoded ammunition” or “serialized ammunition” bills would require ammunition manufacturers to engrave a serial number on the base of the bullet and the inside of the cartridge casing of each round of ammunition for popular sporting caliber center-fire rifles, all center-fire pistols, all .22 rimfire rifles and pistols, and all 12 gauge shotguns. In all but one of the bills, people would be required to forfeit all personally owned non-”encoded” ammunition. After a certain date, it would be illegal to possess non-”encoded” ammunition. Reloading would be rendered illegal.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from The Firearm Blog that falls into the “Garage Gunsmithing” catagory.  This looks like an interesting project for those who tinker.

Homemade .50 BMG

The .50-Caliber Rifle Construction Manual written by Bill Holmes was published in 2002. The Amazon customer reviews have criticized the book for its poor drawings and complex construction techniques.

More

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Comments No Comments »

 

The NSSF has put together a great fact sheet on Assault Weapons.  The fact sheet debunks many of the liberal myths that have been floating around since the 1990s. 

Attention liberals…find a friend that can read this to you.  You may learn something.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON SO-CALLED ‘ASSAULT WEAPONS’

What has erroneously been termed an “assault weapon” is a semi-automatic firearm that fires just one bullet with each pull of the trigger (versus a fully automatic firearm — -

AR-15 (not an assult weapon)

(not an assult weapon)

- which continues to shoot until the trigger is released). Specifically, has incorrectly defined an “assault weapon” as a semi-automatic firearm that can accept a detachable magazine and has two or more of the following cosmetic features (it is these cosmetic features that distinguish the firearm from other “non-assault weapons.”):

• A folding or telescoping stock
• A grip
• A mount
• A flash , or threads to attach one
• A grenade launcher

None of these features figure into the criminal misuse of firearms, regardless of their appearance.

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

There is a tremendous amount of misinformation surrounding the issue of so-called “assault weapons.” Below are several of the more misleading allegations related to these firearms followed by corresponding statements of fact:

Claim: A commercially-sold “assault weapon” is a and has no place in civilian hands.

Fact: A so-called “assault weapon” is NOT a or automatic firearm. Automatic firearms were severely restricted from civilian ownership under the 1934 National Firearms Act. A so-called “assault weapon” is functionally no different than any other “legal” firearm. These guns fire in the same manner as any other semi-automatic firearm (one shot per trigger pull – no spray firing), they shoot the same as other guns of the same caliber and are no more powerful. What differentiates a so-called “assault weapon” from other guns is cosmetic; for example, the type of stock on the gun, which makes the conventionally operating firearm look more like a firearm.

The gun-ban lobby understands that the confusion over what is and what is not an “assault weapon” only benefits them. Consider this statement from Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center:

“The public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a is presumed to be a — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

Claim: Semi-automatic “assault weapons” are high-powered guns that are meant for war.

Fact: So-called “Assault weapons” are more often than not less powerful than other hunting rifles. The term “assault weapon” was conjured up by anti-gun legislators to scare voters into thinking these firearms are something out of a horror movie. These guns are used for many activities. In fact, the Colt and M1A, both labeled “assault weapons,” are the rifles most often used for marksmanship competitions in the United States. And their cartridges are standard hunting calibers, useful for game up to and including deer.

Claim: The 1994 “” helped to reduce violent crime.

Fact: A recent comprehensive study by the Centers for Disease Control — hardly a pro-gun entity — looked at the full panoply of gun control measures — including the “” — and concluded that none could be proven to reduce crime. Homicide statistics demonstrate that the miniscule use of so-called “assault weapons” in crime (less than 1 percent) continued to decrease after the ten-year ban expired in 2004 and their manufacturing and sales resumed.

Another study, commissioned by , found “the banned weapons and were never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders.”

The report also noted that so-called “assault weapons” were “rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.”

Conclusion:

Crime control should be based upon solid facts, not emotions, cosmetics or appearance. Semi-automatic firearms are now the most popular type of firearm in America and are used for a wide variety of legitimate sporting purposes, including hunting, small game control, target shooting and personal defense. They should not be banned.

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from The Firearm Blog regarding a nice looking weapons platform.  The SIG 556 fits the bill:

New SIG 556 Classic (550 “Clone”)

Earlier this month SIG announced an the new SIG 556 Classic. The design is modeled on the SIG 550. From what I can see the primary difference is the swiss style folding stock and polymer handguard.

Cid  1 0D2Aa28C0D2A9Fa8006Ec0548525
SIG 556 Classic

800Px-Stgw 90-1
SIG 550 (Photo from Wikipedia)

I am surprised they did not duplicate the “classic” 550 handguard exactly since the main selling point of this rifle is the look. It does not include the 550 integral bipod.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from Of Arms and the Law, regarding asanine “bore size” laws.

Banning guns by their bore size

Scott Back has thoughts over at New Jersey Voices. There’s a proposal in the NJ Assembly A2116, soon up for a vote, that bans anything modern gun of .50 or over, and any muzzleloader of .60 or over. I guess NJ can forget about Revolutionary War re-enactments if it passes. Must have been an epidemic of assault-weapon musketry over there.

More

Related posts

Tags: , ,

Comments No Comments »