Posts Tagged “Gun Registration”

Reading ’s regurgitated tripe on gun control drives me nuts.  His mission is to enact the permanently in an effort to “protect the children.”  Citing  that Assault Weapons belong on foreign battlefields not in our streets.  I am certain and the rest of the Liberal Democrats will not stop with one ban, but rather will try to ban CHL/CCW, and other items.

I wonder if the people in this picture wished they had not been subjected to and gun control.   I can really see the Liberal logic in the concept of total gun control safeguarding the children.  I am sure the mothers in this picture are not the least bit worried.

Warsaw Ghetto (Circa 1940)

Warsaw Ghetto (Circa 1940)

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

After reading this update from NRA-ILA Site Updates I am wondering why we need a House Resolution to enforce the intentions of the .  For years we have heard about the judicial precedence and how the court’s rulings revise laws (aka Legislating from the Bench).  Why then must we pass a when the highest court in the land has made a decision? 

Revised “District of Columbia Personal Protection Act” Introduced

Thursday, July 31, 2008
This (H.R. 6691) is necessary to enforce the U.S. ’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, by repealing the District’s recently enacted unconstitutional restrictions on its residents’ right to keep and bear arms.

1. Repeal D.C. Ban on Semiautomatic Pistols

In , the Court held that “Handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid”. Semiautomatic pistols are the most commonly owned handguns in the (75 percent of the handguns sold in the past 20 years are semiautomatics), and are therefore “the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home”. The new D.C. City Council ordinance continues the 30-year old ban on semiautomatic pistols, which clearly violates the decision. This bill repeals D.C.’s ban on semiautomatic pistols in order to comply with .

2. Restore Right of Self-Defense in the Home

In , the Court held that “the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is therefore unconstitutional.” The D.C. ordinance provides that trigger locks may only be removed and made operable if there is an “immediate” threat of danger. Once a threat is “immediate”, however, there is no time to remove a trigger lock or assemble a firearm. This clearly violates the decision. This bill repeals D.C.’s requirement that be disassembled or secured with a trigger lock in the home.

3. Repeal Registration Requirement

The D.C. ordinance maintains an extremely burdensome registration process for handguns and , requiring: multiple visits to headquarters; ballistics testing; passing a written test on D.C. gun laws; fingerprinting; and limiting registration to one per 90 days. Each of these must be met before D.C. residents are allowed to legally own a . This bill repeals the current D.C. registration system, which is unduly burdensome and serves as a vehicle for even more onerous restrictions.

4. Allow D.C. Residents to Purchase Handguns

Federal prohibits the purchase of a outside of a person’s state of residence. There are currently no dealers in the District of Columbia, nor are there likely to be in the near future. Therefore, D.C. residents are allowed under the decision to possess handguns, but are prohibited by federal from purchasing handguns. This bill creates an exemption to the federal ban on interstate sales by allowing D.C. residents to purchase handguns in and .

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from Snowflakes in Hell

Statement on New DC Gun Bill

As a follow up to the news that NRA managed to hammer out a deal with Congress to stop the gun registration shenanigans by Mayor Fenty and the DC Council, they have a released this statement:

Today, in a bi-partisan effort, Congressman Travis Childers, Congressmen John Dingell, John Tanner, Mike Ross and Mark Souder, along with 47 of their colleagues, introduced the Second Amendment Enforcement Act. This critical overturns D.C.’s recently enacted emergency laws that continue to defy the recent ruling by continuing to restrict residents’ right to self-defense. This National Rifle Association-backed bill is needed to enforce the U.S. ’s decision in v. .

On June 26, the U. S. held in v. that “the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.” The clearly stated that handguns are constitutionally-protected arms because they are commonly used, are typically possessed by -abiding citizens for lawful purposes, are considered by the American people to be the quintessential self-defense weapon, are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home and are the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep and use for protection of home and family.

The Second Amendment Enforcement Act will:

* Repeal the District’s ban on semi-automatic handguns. Semi-automatic pistols have been the most commonly purchased handguns in the over the last 20 years, and therefore a ban on those is unconstitutional as decided by ;

* Restore the right of self-defense by repealing the requirement that be disassembled or secured with a trigger lock in the home;

* Repeal the current D.C. registration system that requires multiple visits to police headquarters; testing; passing a written test on D.C. gun laws; fingerprinting; and limiting registration to one handgun per 90 days. The current system is unduly burdensome and serves as a vehicle for even more onerous restrictions; and

* Create a limited exemption to the federal ban on interstate handgun sales by allowing D.C. residents to purchase handguns in and . Currently there are no dealers in the , and the federal ban prohibits residents from purchasing handguns outside of the District; therefore, District residents have no means of purchasing handguns.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from NRA-ILA Site Updates

D.C. Is Sued Again Over Rules

The man who successfully challenged the D.C. ban before the U.S. filed a second federal lawsuit yesterday, alleging that the District`s new gun-registration system is burdensome and continues to unlawfully outlaw most pistols.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »