Posts Tagged “Machine Gun”

Here is a great post from A Keyboard and a .45.  This was a blast from the past for me as I remember much talk of burying weapons and .  I think the E-tools sold in record numbers between 1986 and 1996.

Long Term Underground Firearm and Ammo Storage

There is quite a bit of ‘net’ wisdom out there on the best way to prepare and store a firearm and for “just in case”. Most of this information is theoretical and should work out just fine, but in most cases the end results of these preparations have yet to be determined.

Backwoods Home Magazine has the end results of one such experiment.

By Charles Wood

Back in the early 1990s the outlook for the nation in general and gun owners in particular seemed rather grim to many people. A few years earlier in 1986, had banned civilians from owning newly manufactured machine guns. There was ever more strident talk of banning semi-automatic weapons or so called assault weapons. Many of us regarded a semi-automatic rifle as the foundation of a home defense battery. Many of us believed that more laws banning ever more types of guns were imminent. About that time I acquired a Ruger Ranch Rifle through a private sale. I decided to stash it away in a safe place just in case my worst fear was to materialize, another gun ban.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

This video was posted by the NSSF a few months ago, but is great information for the general public.  This video explains the differences between Assault Weapons, Assault Rifles, Machine Guns, Semi Automatics, and so forth.  It is very well done, from a respected source.

Related posts

Tags: , , ,

Comments No Comments »

 

The has put together a great fact sheet on Assault Weapons.  The fact sheet debunks many of the liberal myths that have been floating around since the 1990s. 

Attention liberals…find a friend that can read this to you.  You may learn something.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON SO-CALLED ‘ASSAULT WEAPONS’

What has erroneously been termed an “assault weapon” is a semi-automatic firearm that fires just one bullet with each pull of the trigger (versus a fully automatic firearm — -

AR-15 (not an assult weapon)

(not an assult weapon)

- which continues to shoot until the trigger is released). Specifically, legislation has incorrectly defined an “assault weapon” as a semi-automatic firearm that can accept a detachable magazine and has two or more of the following cosmetic features (it is these cosmetic features that distinguish the firearm from other “non-assault weapons.”):

• A folding or telescoping stock
• A grip
• A mount
• A flash suppressor, or threads to attach one
• A grenade launcher

None of these features figure into the criminal misuse of , regardless of their appearance.

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

There is a tremendous amount of misinformation surrounding the issue of so-called “assault weapons.” Below are several of the more misleading allegations related to these followed by corresponding statements of fact:

Claim: A commercially-sold “assault weapon” is a and has no place in civilian hands.

Fact: A so-called “assault weapon” is NOT a or automatic firearm. Automatic were severely restricted from civilian ownership under the 1934 National Act. A so-called “assault weapon” is functionally no different than any other “legal” firearm. These guns fire in the same manner as any other semi-automatic firearm (one shot per trigger pull – no spray firing), they shoot the same as other guns of the same caliber and are no more powerful. What differentiates a so-called “assault weapon” from other guns is cosmetic; for example, the type of stock on the gun, which makes the conventionally operating firearm look more like a firearm.

The gun-ban lobby understands that the confusion over what is and what is not an “assault weapon” only benefits them. Consider this statement from Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center:

“The public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a is presumed to be a — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

Claim: Semi-automatic “assault weapons” are high-powered guns that are meant for war.

Fact: So-called “Assault weapons” are more often than not less powerful than other hunting rifles. The term “assault weapon” was conjured up by anti-gun legislators to scare voters into thinking these are something out of a horror movie. These guns are used for many activities. In fact, the Colt and Springfield M1A, both labeled “assault weapons,” are the rifles most often used for marksmanship competitions in the . And their cartridges are standard hunting calibers, useful for game up to and including deer.

Claim: The 1994 “assault weapons ban” helped to reduce violent crime.

Fact: A recent comprehensive study by the Centers for Disease Control — hardly a pro-gun entity — looked at the full panoply of gun control measures — including the “assault weapons ban” — and concluded that none could be proven to reduce crime. Homicide statistics demonstrate that the miniscule use of so-called “assault weapons” in crime (less than 1 percent) continued to decrease after the ten-year ban expired in 2004 and their manufacturing and sales resumed.

Another study, commissioned by , found “the banned weapons and were never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders.”

The report also noted that so-called “assault weapons” were “rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.”

Conclusion:

Crime control legislation should be based upon solid facts, not emotions, cosmetics or appearance. Semi-automatic are now the most popular type of firearm in America and are used for a wide variety of legitimate sporting purposes, including hunting, small game control, target shooting and personal defense. They should not be banned.

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is a great post from The Firearm Blog

Colt’s new AR-15

Over the past few months Colt has been unveiling a variety of new AR-15 . If a replacement for the M16 or M4 is chosen they want it to be a Colt. To ensure this designed a range of weapons that should cover all bases. David @ Defense Review has been relentlessly covering the new .

Many of the improvements Colt have developed have been applied to all these guns, I won’t list them all, click the links to read the full details.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Here is an update on v. DC from Snowflakes in Hell

v. DC

That’s right, it’s not DC v. .  Dick is suing the District of Colombia once again over their new gun laws.  We wish Mr. the best of luck.

UPDATE: You can see a copy of the complaint here.

UPDATE: Now that I’ve had time to read, it looks like they are basically asking for an injunction against:

  1. The testing nonsense
  2. The nonsense about not being able to register a semi-automatic pistol under DC’s ridiculous definition of “
  3. They ask for any further relief the court may want to offer.

What they are not asking for an injunction on is whether semi-autos that can shoot more than 12 rounds from a magazine.  Also, again, they aren’t challenging the registration itself.  That’ll all be later cases.  Pick the low hanging fruit first.

More

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »