Risk

From PEaM

Jump to:navigation, search

Risk is due to assumptions that have not been validated. These assumptions may later be found to be wrong. Any work that still depends on a wrong assumption may have to be redone with new assumptions, increasing the cost and duration of the project.

PMI Risk is an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or negative effect on a project’s objectives.[1]
AACEI
Risk[2]

1. The degree of dispersion or variability around the expected or "best" value which is estimated to exist for the economic variable in question, e.g., a quantitative measure of the upper and lower limits which are considered reasonable for the factor being estimated.

2. An ambiguous term that can mean any of the following:

  • All uncertainty (threats + opportunities); or
  • Downside uncertainty (a.k.a. Threats); or
  • The net impact or effect of uncertainty (threats – opportunities). The convention used should be clearly stated to avoid misunderstanding.

3. Probability of an undesirable outcome.

When assessing the risks that remain during the project, it is necessary to keep track of what assumptions have not yet been verified and what work still depends on them.

Related terminology

AACEI
Risk (Project specific)
A risk taxonomy designation used to classify project risks for the purposes of selecting a quantification method (i.e., contingency determination). Project-specific risks are uncertainties (threats or opportunities) related to events, actions, and other conditions that are specific to the scope of a project. (e.g., weather, soil conditions, etc.). The impacts of project-specific risks are more or less unique to a project. The historically inconsistent project-specific nature of the risk-to-impact relationship favors the use of more deterministic methods of quantification such as expected value calculations. In this taxonomy usage, it is the opposite of “systemic” risks.[2]
Risk (Systemic)
A risk taxonomy designation used to classify project risks for the purposes of selecting a quantification method (i.e., contingency determination). Systemic risks are uncertainties (threats or opportunities) that are an artifact of an industry, company or project system, culture, strategy, complexity, technology, or similar over-arching characteristics. The historically consistent nature of the systemic risk-to-impact relationship favors the use of methods such as empirically-based parametric modeling for quantification. In this taxonomy usage, it is the opposite of “project-specific” risks.[2]

See also

References

  1. Project Management Institute (2008). A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th, Project Management Institute.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International [AACEI] (2007). Cost Engineering Terminology, 10S-90, Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International.
PMBOK-4th.gif
This article contains text from the Project Management Institute PM Body of Knowledge which is copyright all rights reserved by Project Management Institute, Inc. (PMI). Project Management Body of Knowledge is a registered trademark of PMI
Aace2003logo.jpg
This article contains text from the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering website which is copyright all rights reserved by Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International (AACEI).
Navigation
Toolbox
Print/export